Skip to content

Comments

fix: added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml#5979

Draft
patelchaitany wants to merge 5 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
patelchaitany:bug-ray
Draft

fix: added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml#5979
patelchaitany wants to merge 5 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
patelchaitany:bug-ray

Conversation

@patelchaitany
Copy link

@patelchaitany patelchaitany commented Feb 17, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds the ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Add Ray dependencies to Feast Operator and feature server images to support Ray Offline Store and Ray Compute Engine

Feast now supports Ray but upon configuring services with Ray getting runtime error

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ray'
FeastModuleImportError: Could not import module 'feast.infra.offline_stores.contrib.ray_offline_store.ray'

Misc


Open with Devin

Signed-off-by: Chaitany patel <patelchaitany93@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 3 additional findings.

Open in Devin Review

@patelchaitany patelchaitany changed the title Bug : added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml Fix: added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml Feb 17, 2026
@ntkathole
Copy link
Member

@patelchaitany Please run make lock-python-dependencies-all and commit the updated requirements files

@patelchaitany patelchaitany changed the title Fix: added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml fix: added ray in the minimal in the pyproject.toml Feb 17, 2026
@patelchaitany patelchaitany requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2026 11:17
Copy link
Member

@franciscojavierarceo franciscojavierarceo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think Ray should be in minimal

@patelchaitany
Copy link
Author

@franciscojavierarceo, the issue is that feast-operator uses the minimal image, so using the Ray offline store requires us to maintain a custom Docker image. I believe adding Ray to the minimal build would solve this and improve the developer experience. Do you think that is a valid approach?

@ntkathole
Copy link
Member

ntkathole commented Feb 18, 2026

I don't think Ray should be in minimal

@franciscojavierarceo We will need these compute engines in some image so that users do not need to build their custom images. We can either include in ray/spark in minimal or have new feast[server] group to build image, but having separate group means having 2 different images as well. Some slack context - https://feastopensource.slack.com/archives/C01M2GYP0UC/p1768568651039479

@franciscojavierarceo
Copy link
Member

@ntkathole i think the custom image path is the right option or we deploy images for each support compute engine (e.g., Ray, Spark, etc.).

@patelchaitany patelchaitany marked this pull request as draft February 19, 2026 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants